First off, a huge
congrats to Tessanne Chin for being the Season 5 winner of The Voice! It is
just a major accomplishment to make it into the top 3, but to actually win, the
not only the dream of a lifetime, but the accomplishment as well! However, I
can’t help but wonder, if it is correct that the judges that allow contestants
get as far as Tessaanne did who were semi-pro at one point, working as one of
the backup singers for Jimmy Cliff?
This is an interesting quote from the Daily
News, “Fresh off her victory on TV's top-rated
singing competition, the 28-year-old powerhouse singer is already in heady
company. Though she had once opened for her idol Celine
Dion at Jamaica's Jazz and Blues Festival, on the finale, Chin found
herself sharing the same stage again with Dion — this time for a nationally
televised duet in which she was the star,”
(http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/voice-winner-olympian-corner-article-1.1552130#ixzz2nwQXZxsN, 12/18/13, Rivera, Z).
(http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/voice-winner-olympian-corner-article-1.1552130#ixzz2nwQXZxsN, 12/18/13, Rivera, Z).
As I view these
award shows, whole concept is to give a brand new act a chance to make it with a
unique form of publicity and marketing. However, when you have people who have
been semi-pro their voice has a certain type of training that others have not
gone through. If this is the level of experience the judges want, then we need
to ask, what are the qualifications when America competes just to land a spot?
How does it look for others who haven’t had any professional training to that
level?
What are your
thoughts of this subject? Do you believe that Will Chaplin or Jacquie Lee
should have won?
No comments:
Post a Comment